Mountford Chambers delivers a nationwide and international service to clients, who are assured quality advice, advocacy and representation at all levels.
News & Insights
Jim’s client was charged alongside another with possession of several firearms, including a pistol and sawn-off shotgun, with intent to endanger life. The case dated back to 2018 and turned on the presence of DNA evidence. It required careful analysis of the forensic evidence which the Crown had gathered, and complex questions regarding statistical analysis of that DNA.
After the jury had been empanelled, and following detailed negotiation with the expert witnesses on both sides, the Crown were forced to accept a number of Section 10 admissions which were extremely damaging to their case. As a result, the Crown ultimately offered no evidence in respect of all charges, and the Judge directed the jury to return not guilty verdicts.
Jim was instructed by Rasna Loi of ABV Solicitors.
Tom Edwards looks at the impact of the shift from Joint Enterprise to Common Purpose in the five years since…
Ben Hargreaves explores the inherent challenges in the admissibility of sexual history in sex cases. Section 41 of the Youth…
Silas Lee, pupil barrister, reviews the statutory regime on witness anonymity. Anonymous witness orders are most commonly sought by the…
An analysis of the law on fitness to plead and stand trial in the magistrates’ courts: Silas Lee reviews the…