News & Insights

Close up pf railings at Mountford Chambers

Zayd Ahmed successful in abuse of process argument in drug supply case


Zayd Ahmed was instructed by Stephen Garland of EBR Attridge to represent a defendant charged with multiple counts of possession with intent to supply class A drugs where the value was significant.

The defence relied upon was under s45 Modern Slavery Act 2015.

Zayd and Stephen instructed a modern slavery expert, and Zayd made an abuse of process argument on the basis of failure to investigate and the principles in V.C.L. and A.N. v The United Kingdom (Applications nos. 77587/12 and 74603/12)

Following legal arguments, the Crown conceded that it had failed to reconsider its decision to prosecute in light of VCL and offered no evidence against the defendant.

Related Content


Related Practice Areas

Popular Insights

Tom Edwards looks at the impact of the shift from Joint Enterprise to Common Purpose in the five years since…


Ben Hargreaves explores the inherent challenges in the admissibility of sexual history in sex cases. Section 41 of the Youth…


An analysis of the law on fitness to plead and stand trial in the magistrates’ courts: Silas Lee reviews the…


Silas Lee, pupil barrister, reviews the statutory regime on witness anonymity. Anonymous witness orders are most commonly sought by the…


Portfolio Builder

Select the practice areas that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Title Type CV Email

Remove All


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)