News & Insights
Zayd Ahmed represented the defendant, who was charged, along with another, with possession with intent to supply Class A and Class D drugs.
The Crown’s case was that the defendant was found in a property containing large quantities of drugs, weapons, cash, and phones with messages relating to the supply of drugs.
The Crown also attempted to introduce evidence of rap lyrics created by the defendant, which they suggested amounted to a confession to being a drug dealer. However, after a successful application under section 78, this evidence was excluded, as was a note found on the defendant’s phone which the prosecution described as a tick list.
Zayd was able to demonstrate flaws in the Crown’s case, particularly regarding DNA and phone attribution, and he cross-examined the officer in charge on investigative failures.
After a four-day trial, the jury returned unanimous not guilty verdicts on all counts.
Zayd was instructed by Shahid Khan and Ian John-Baptiste of Advice Wise Solicitors.
Tom Edwards looks at the impact of the shift from Joint Enterprise to Common Purpose in the five years since…
Ben Hargreaves explores the inherent challenges in the admissibility of sexual history in sex cases. Section 41 of the Youth…
Silas Lee, pupil barrister, reviews the statutory regime on witness anonymity. Anonymous witness orders are most commonly sought by the…
An analysis of the law on fitness to plead and stand trial in the magistrates’ courts: Silas Lee reviews the…