News & Insights

empty swing

Zayd Ahmed secures acquittal after successful abuse of process argument in child abduction case.


Zayd Ahmed was instructed to defend the defendant for trial who was charged with child abduction.

The case involved parallel proceedings in the Family Courts.

After numerous applications for disclosure under section 8 for documents from the Family Courts, the Crown obtained the documents and deemed the documents not to be disclosable.

The defence then obtained the documents directly from the Family Court which evidenced various inconsistences with the complainant’s account.

Zayd drafted an abuse of process argument on the basis that the Crown had acted in bad faith and by failing to pay proper attention to disclosure, they offended the court’s sense of justice and undermined public confidence.

On the day of the trial, the Crown conceded the argument made by Zayd and offered no evidence against the defendant.

A formal verdict of not guilty was then entered by the Court.

Zayd was instructed by Polpitiya & Co.


Related Practice Areas

Popular Insights

Tom Edwards looks at the impact of the shift from Joint Enterprise to Common Purpose in the five years since…


Ben Hargreaves explores the inherent challenges in the admissibility of sexual history in sex cases. Section 41 of the Youth…


An analysis of the law on fitness to plead and stand trial in the magistrates’ courts: Silas Lee reviews the…


Silas Lee, pupil barrister, reviews the statutory regime on witness anonymity. Anonymous witness orders are most commonly sought by the…


Portfolio Builder

Select the practice areas that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Title Type CV Email

Remove All


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)