Mountford Chambers delivers a nationwide and international service to clients, who are assured quality advice, advocacy and representation at all levels.
News & Insights
Shekyena’s youth client was found not guilty in the Crown Court of possessing a firearm alleged to have been used during the robbery of a car. In addition, the jury was unable to reach a verdict on the robbery, which led to the prosecution offering no evidence.
The trial involved a co-defendant, the client’s friend and driver of the stolen vehicle. The co-defendant admitted stealing the car, but denied robbery and threatening the complainant with a zombie knife.
Shekyena’s client was a backseat passenger during the incident and denied being part of any joint plan to steal the car. He also denied pressing a gun against the complainant’s shoulder who was sat in the front passenger’s seat while the car was being stolen.
Following a 6 day trial, Shekyena’s client was acquitted. The co-defendant was acquitted of possessing the zombie knife, but found guilty of robbery.
Shekyena was instructed by Trudi Burlton and assisted by Serge O’Reilly of PPG Solicitors.
Tom Edwards looks at the impact of the shift from Joint Enterprise to Common Purpose in the five years since…
Ben Hargreaves explores the inherent challenges in the admissibility of sexual history in sex cases. Section 41 of the Youth…
Silas Lee, pupil barrister, reviews the statutory regime on witness anonymity. Anonymous witness orders are most commonly sought by the…
An analysis of the law on fitness to plead and stand trial in the magistrates’ courts: Silas Lee reviews the…