The core of Joe’s practice is criminal defence, which in recent years has encompassed instructions in defending cases of murder and serious organised crime, both as led junior and junior alone.
Joe has been instructed in a number of high-profile murder cases, often representing the first Defendant in multi-handed trials. Those cases have included a variety of complex issues, including cause of death, crime scene reconstruction, evidence from anonymous witnesses, and joint enterprise. He has been prosecuted by Treasury Counsel in almost all murder cases.
Joe has been instructed to defend in wide ranging allegations of serious crime. He is currently instructed as lead junior in a case said to relate to a major international crime organisation involving the alleged importation of many hundreds of kilos of class A drugs and large quantities of unlawful firearms.
He is also instructed in a number of cases falling under the umbrella of Operation Venetic, arising out of the taking down of the EncroChat telephone system by French and Dutch police.
Outside of these areas, Joe defends in cases spanning the almanac of criminal offences, including allegations of serious violence often involving multiple defendants, complex forensic evidence, “dangerousness”; firearms, where the issue of duress is raised; and road traffic offences which have resulted in fatalities.
Joe has recently expanded his practice to include acting on behalf of a number of national animal welfare charities and advising them on the prospects of instigating private prosecutions against various individuals and bodies.
Notable Crime cases
Murder and serious violence
R v Kwateng (Central Criminal Court)
Represented the first defendant in a multi-handed allegation of murder. The fatal stabbing of a gang rival took place in a busy street in south London in broad daylight. The entire episode was captured on CCTV. There was extensive litigation in respect of gang affiliation, including videos, rap lyrics and police intelligence. The defendant was acquitted of murder and manslaughter.
R v AM (Central Criminal Court)
Represented one of four defendants charged with a gunshot murder in a residential street in south London. The defendant was said to have been the assigned ‘getaway’ driver in the shooting. The case involved extensive digital and CCTV evidence. The defendant was acquitted of murder and manslaughter.
R v Rahman (Central Criminal Court)
2-handed murder trial. Represented first defendant. Case concerned gang rivalry in the local Bengali community. Sensitive cultural issues.
R v Azad (Reading Crown Court)
7-handed murder trial. Represented first defendant who was said to have been the principal in the stabbing of a rival in a residential street with swords.
R v JW (Central Criminal Court)
Junior alone instructed to represent youth charged with attempted murder of individual on a busy commuter train in gangland retribution.
R v JC (Central Criminal Court)
Junior alone instructed to represent youth charged with attempted murder. The background was a bitter postcode gang rivalry in east London.
Firearms, drugs and serious organised crime
R v DC
The Defendant was said to be a member of a well known Organised Crime Group based in Ireland. The prosecution maintained that over the entire enterprise hundreds of kilos of cocaine had been imported to Ireland from the continent. The consignments also included firearms and ammunition. The Defendant was said to have been in charge of the logistics for transportation in the UK and onward importation into Ireland. The case was particularly sensitive because of considerable press interest from Ireland.
R v Rivers
Leading junior in defence of alleged member of a London gang who travelled to Bournemouth to commit armed robbery of a jewellery store in broad daylight.
R v Bruce
Represented member of a London organised crime group trafficking drugs and vulnerable individuals to the south west. Acquitted after trial.
R v Musa
Acquitted of human trafficking and labour exploitation. Defendant was said to be member of crime family who trafficked and exploited scores of workers over five years.
R v Farah
Junior alone. Defendant accused of committing twelve armed robberies of banks and building societies across north London over a 4-week period. Complex issues regarding mental health.
R v HK
Defence of money trafficker said to be sending money to Turkey to benefit terrorist organisations in Syria.
R v Pellett
Defence of a UK Border Agency officer charged as the principal defendant in the importation of drugs and firearms into the UK. Case garnered significant press attention.
R v MB
Defendant acquitted of tobacco smuggling on a significant scale. Prosecution relied upon on-board ‘thermal” data never previously deployed in criminal trials.
R v HM
Represented first defendant in cocaine, ketamine and cannabis national supply ring. Case was complex such that it required three separate trials. Acquitted. Led junior. Operation Aramac.
R v McGrath
Defendant charged with multiple counts of blackmail and section 18 wounding. Eight-week trial with Crown alleging Defendant was a “one-man mafia”. Acquitted of all but one count of blackmail.
R v PW
Major drug supply operation between north west and north east organised crime groups amounting to “millions of pounds worth of class A drugs”. Acquitted after trial. Led junior.
R v DH
Junior alone. Drug supply and money laundering conspiracy involving eighteen defendants linked to a notorious criminal fraternity in Derbyshire. Suspended sentence secured for client.
R v Sanas
Charged with international trafficking and serious sexual offences. Two linked trials took place amidst heightened media interest.