Mountford Chambers delivers a nationwide and international service to clients, who are assured quality advice, advocacy and representation at all levels.
Alexandra’s criminal practice is focused on organised crime and serious violence.
Equally adept at dealing with complex telephonic data as she is cross-examining witnesses, Alexandra has defended in serious, high-profile cases including cocaine importation, brothel keeping and firearms conspiracies. She takes a tactical approach to multi-handed cases, and understands the nuances of organised crime.
Alexandra is ranked as a Leading Junior in Crime in the Legal 500, 2023.
R v G  Isleworth Crown Court
Representing the first defendant in a conspiracy to supply 250kg of Ketamine.
R v X 
Instructed for the first defendant in a conspiracy to supply firearms.
R v M  Sheffield Crown Court
Representing a defendant charged as part of a large conspiracy to smuggle drugs and weapons into prison
R v M  Kingston Crown Court
Secured acquittal for a young man alleged to be part of a conspiracy to supply over 5kg of heroin.
R v S  Harrow Crown Court
Represented a young man accused of attempted aggravated burglary and possession of a firearm and ammunition with intent to endanger life. The Crown’s case was that he was the leader of a large group that attempted to break into a cannabis factory armed with a loaded gun. The prosecution relied upon a combination of CCTV footage, cell site evidence, DNA evidence, and material taken from the defendant’s handset. The client was acquitted of all counts.
R v B  Isleworth Crown Court
Defendant acquitted of attempting to cause grievous bodily harm to two police officers, using his car as a weapon.
R v M  Harrow Crown Court
Written representations in conjunction with reports from two psychiatrists and a psychologist persuaded the Crown that it was not in the public interest to proceed with a trial of issue against her vulnerable client, who faced an allegation of false imprisonment as part of a wider conspiracy to kidnap and blackmail a teenager.
R v G  Reading Crown Court
Operation Lithuania – Instructed to represent a defendant accused of encouraging or assisting an offender in relation to offences of false imprisonment and blackmail stemming from a large county lines conspiracy.
Coverage: My London News.
R v T  Warwick Crown Court - Operation Crossfeed
Led by James Tilbury, representing a young man accused of kidnap and perverting the course of justice following the stabbing of two members of a rival gang by an associate.
R v R  St Albans Crown Court
Conspiracy to steal count stayed following a successful abuse of process argument brought on the basis that to allow the matter to proceed would be an affront to justice.
R v S  Cardiff Crown Court
Operation Jackdaw 2 – Appeared for a vulnerable defendant charged as part of a drugs conspiracy valued at £16 million, securing a suspended sentence.
R v Z  Wood Green Crown Court
A case involving drugs and the illegal sex trade, led by Richard Furlong. Defendant charged with two conspiracies. Drafted the successful submission of ‘no case to answer’ on the conspiracy to run a brothel count; client found not guilty by the jury on the drugs conspiracy.
R v X  Woolwich Crown Court
Avoided a potential ‘cut-throat’ to secure ‘not guilty’ verdicts for a promising young footballer who was the first of five young defendants prosecuted for a joint enterprise stabbing that took place in broad daylight in a residential street, in spite of the complainant identifying her client as the man with the knife, and the Crown’s assertion that he could be seen holding a knife on CCTV footage of the defendants fleeing the scene.
R v D  Isleworth Crown Court
Operation Mandebras – Complex trial involving multiple conspiracies to facilitate immigration offences, led by James Tilbury.
R v D  Lewes Crown Court
Led by Colin Aylott QC in a multi-handed case relating to an allegation of murder and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.
R v Qosja  1 Cr App. R. 17
Point of law taken at first instance and on appeal – with leave – as to the immediacy of fear of violence requisite to make out a section 4A offence of stalking (discussed here)
R v K  Harrow Crown Court
Represented a young man of good character accused of causing grievous bodily harm by breaking the complainant’s leg; acquittal secured on the basis of self-defence, relying on the evidence of a defence expert pathologist as to the nature of the fracture.
R v Raduca  EWCA Crim 279
Sentence for a string of dwelling burglaries reduced on appeal.
R v C  Central Criminal Court
Operation Namix – Importation of semi-automatic firearms. The case involved the defence of duress and ongoing disclosure of large amounts of phone data throughout the trial, led by Richard Button.
R v F  Manchester Crown Court
Led by Chris Henley, successfully opposed the first forfeiture application made under s. 23 of the Terrorism Act 2000.
Alexandra has a strong practice in financial crime. Able to deal with cases of significant volume and complexity, she has a thorough grasp of the detailed transactional material involved in this area.
Alexandra is ranked as a Leading Junior in Fraud: Crime in the Legal 500 2023.
R v B  Southwark
Instructed to represent one of seven individuals (and two companies) facing allegations of fraudulent trading in the context of property rentals.
R v W  Leeds
Led junior defending in a significant Trading Standards prosecution relating to the secondary ticketing market.
R v C  Birmingham
Instructed to defend an allegation of tax evasion spanning several years.
R v W  Stoke-on-Trent
Represented the second defendant as leading counsel in a six-handed money laundering conspiracy alleged to relate to funds exceeding £120 million. The Judge was persuaded to reject the Crown’s characterisation of leading role, and the defendant received a total sentence of only 5 ½ years.
R v R  Inner London Crown Court
Acquittal secured for a defendant charged with conspiring with four others to conceal the proceeds of crime through multiple bank transfers and two properties. Following service of skeleton arguments setting out submissions of ‘no case to answer’ at the close of the prosecution case, the Crown offered no evidence.
Represented one of four defendants prosecuted for conspiracy to defraud arising out of a Trading Standards investigation in a trial that lasted eight weeks.
R v S  Southwark
Secured a suspended sentence for a woman charged with transferring criminal property in excess of £250,000.
R v B  Central Criminal Court & Birmingham Crown Court
Operation Vanilla – Led junior in a Carbon Credits boiler room fraud valued at £6.2m involving over 10,000 pages of evidence and a nuanced bad character argument – acquitted of the conspiracy and Serious Crime Prevention Order application successfully resisted.
Coverage: International Adviser and Metro.
R v G  Reading Crown Court
Operation Salvage – Led junior in a multi-handed ‘crash for cash’ fraud said to be worth £8m, securing a short sentence after trial, the Judge accepting that the defendant’s role was lesser, contrary to the submissions of the Crown.
Coverage: Daily Mail.
Operation Accordion – Led junior in a case involving multiple mortgage fraud conspiracies.
R v W  Cardiff Crown Court
Successfully represented an eighty-year-old woman charged with money laundering arising out of a theft committed against Cardiff Council. Trial involved complex arguments on character. Bad character application successfully opposed and Judge persuaded to give a Good Character direction instead. Client acquitted.
Alexandra’s regulatory practice encompasses defending in Health and Safety Prosecutions, and offences under the Housing Act prosecuted by Local Authorities.
She has experience of representing both companies and company directors charged with offences prosecuted by the Health and Safety Executive.
She has also conducted licencing appeals.
R v B  Croydon Magistrates’ Court
Represented a company charged with an environmental offence. The company had failed to secure the relevant permits ahead of demolition.
DC v G, S & S  Sheffield Crown Court
Represented the company and both directors initially facing an indictment containing ten counts under the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974, all relating to a defective floorboard at a retail premises which led to a customer sustaining an injury. Acceptable pleas were negotiated to the section 3 offences for the company and one of the directors, securing financial penalties for both.
SBC v D  Camberwell Green Magistrates’ Court
Instructed to represent a landlord charged with breaches of Regulation 4 (Duty of manager to take safety measures) of the Management of Houses of Multiple Occupation (England) Regulations 2006, in relation to a failure to ensure that all means of escape from fire are clear and accessible.
BCC v A  Aylesbury Crown Court
Represented one of two defendants charged with nine offences under the Environmental Protection Act 1990.
TFL v A  City of London Magistrates’ Court
Represented a taxi driver appealing TFL’s decision not to renew his PHV licence following his failure both to disclose a conviction and subsequent driving disqualification within the requisite 21 days and to mention it when he renewed his application.
BCC v W  Reading Crown Court
Case involved offences of depositing a controlled waste and failing to prevent a contravention of s.33 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990, the allegation being that commercial waste was deposited on land not subject to an environmental permit. The defendant was acquitted of the second count.
WBC v P  Redhill Magistrates’ Court
Defendant faced six charges, four breaches of the Management of Houses of Multiple Occupation (England) Regulations 2006 and two related counts of fraud. Acceptable pleas negotiated and a financial penalty imposed.
She regularly acts in cash forfeiture hearings and has extensive experience of confiscation proceedings, both led and as a junior alone.
R v A 
Currently instructed to represent a defendant in the High Court in relation to an application for appointment of a receiver
R v D  Derby Crown Court
Represented the first of two defendants in contested confiscation proceedings, a company director who had been convicted of fraud including false invoices, successfully avoiding a hidden assets finding and securing an available amount limited to the cash funds seized during the course of the investigation.
R v A  Nottingham Crown Court
Instructed for a complicated confiscation with issues over the extent of the particular benefit and general conduct, and well as an argument over hidden assets.
R v F  Winchester Crown Court
Successful application under section 23 POCA 2003 for a certificate of inadequacy in circumstances where the applicant’s property portfolio had in aggregate fallen into negative equity, the Crown initially contesting the applicant’s assertion that he was unable to realise the equity from the few individual properties that had retained their value.
R v B  Birmingham Crown Court
Led junior on a confiscation valued at £6.8m; avoided a finding of hidden assets.
R v A  Horsham Magistrates’ Court
Represented the respondent in a cash forfeiture application
R v S  Kingston Crown Court
Represented the defendant at a contested confiscation involving Bitcoins, managing to reduce the benefit to reflect the client’s legitimate income.
R v F  Southwark Crown Court
Led by Peter Corrigan for a confiscation hearing arising following conviction for a fraud valued in excess of £1.2m; written submissions ahead of the final hearing persuaded the Crown to accept that the available amount was £1.
Fraud:Crime: ‘Alexandra is a poised advocate, who commands the confidence of the court and her clients.’
Ranked: Tier 3
Crime: “Her written advice is first rate and guidance during the currency of trials is invaluable.”
Ranked: Tier 3
Crime: ‘Alexandra is a very thorough professional with excellent advocacy skills. Her written advice is first rate and guidance during the currency of trials is invaluable.’
Ranked: Tier 3
Crime: “Alexandra is determined and has great judgement. She is always very well prepared and indomitably determined to fight her client’s corner.”
Ranked: Tier 3
Fraud:Crime: “Alexandra has excellent judgement, relates well to clients, and demonstrates very good and detailed knowledge of the law.”
Ranked: Tier 3
Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)