News & Insights


Operating Department Practitioner cleared of misconduct


X pleaded guilty to failing to provide a breath sample to Police in the Magistrates’ Court in January 2020. As a result, they were disqualified from driving and other ancillary orders made.

Some days after, they posted a story on their Instagram. This attracted an anonymous complaint.

X was found to have done the act, but after a full Fitness to Practise hearing, the post was found not to amount to misconduct and, despite the conviction, X’s fitness to practice was found not to be impaired. This case, whilst factually simple, heavily relied upon the rapidly-growing and nuanced authorities, such as Beckwith v SRA, regarding the ambit of a regulator and tension between regulation and potentially private matters.

Mark Watson was instructed by Harjinder Saundh, Thompsons Solicitors

Related content:


Related Practice Areas

Popular Insights

Tom Edwards looks at the impact of the shift from Joint Enterprise to Common Purpose in the five years since…


Ben Hargreaves explores the inherent challenges in the admissibility of sexual history in sex cases. Section 41 of the Youth…


An analysis of the law on fitness to plead and stand trial in the magistrates’ courts: Silas Lee reviews the…


Silas Lee, pupil barrister, reviews the statutory regime on witness anonymity. Anonymous witness orders are most commonly sought by the…


Portfolio Builder

Select the practice areas that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Title Type CV Email

Remove All


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)