News & Insights
Martyn Hynes represented a father who was acquitted at Crown Court of allegations of sexual offences against a child.
The case involved a child complainant who gave evidence through pre-recorded cross-examination under section 28 procedures, and a first report to a child witness who was subject to live cross examination.
The defence faced significant challenges in relation to disclosure and third-party material, requiring detailed legal argument before the court.
At trial, the defence undertook a sensitive cross-examination of the complainants, mindful of their vulnerability and the restrictions imposed by the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999.
Following deliberations, the jury unanimously rejected the prosecution’s case, acquitting the defendant of all charges.
The verdict brings to an end a lengthy investigation and prosecution, with the court noting the complexity of the legal issues raised.
Martyn Hynes was instructed by Andy Floyd of Victor Clifford Solicitors.
Tom Edwards looks at the impact of the shift from Joint Enterprise to Common Purpose in the five years since…
Ben Hargreaves explores the inherent challenges in the admissibility of sexual history in sex cases. Section 41 of the Youth…
Silas Lee, pupil barrister, reviews the statutory regime on witness anonymity. Anonymous witness orders are most commonly sought by the…