News & Insights

No case to answer in section 18 GBH with intent trial


Zayd Ahmed was instructed to represent the defendant, arrested for attempted murder but charged with wounding with intent and possession of a bladed article. The allegation was that he had stabbed the complainant with a machete, causing a large incision to his face.

There were various strands of evidence including CCTV, several witnesses, forensics and medical records.

After challenging the main prosecution witnesses and cross-examining the OIC on the investigation, the Crown sought to adduce forensic evidence which Zayd successfully applied to exclude.

At the close of the prosecution case, Zayd made a half-time submission on the basis that the evidence, taken at its highest called for speculation and that it would be unsafe to leave the count of wounding with intent to the jury.

The judge found that Mr Ahmed’s submissions were correct in law and acceded to the submission.

The defendant was then unanimously acquitted by the jury of the second count of possessing a bladed article.

Zayd was instructed by Rajesh Bhamm – Tank Jowett Sols.

Slough Observer

Popular Insights

Tom Edwards looks at the impact of the shift from Joint Enterprise to Common Purpose in the five years since…


Ben Hargreaves explores the inherent challenges in the admissibility of sexual history in sex cases. Section 41 of the Youth…


An analysis of the law on fitness to plead and stand trial in the magistrates’ courts: Silas Lee reviews the…


Silas Lee, pupil barrister, reviews the statutory regime on witness anonymity. Anonymous witness orders are most commonly sought by the…


Portfolio Builder

Select the practice areas that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Title Type CV Email

Remove All


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)