Mountford Chambers delivers a nationwide and international service to clients, who are assured quality advice, advocacy and representation at all levels.
News & Insights
The defendant faced an indictment containing four counts including section 18 GBH, robbery, and two offences of ABH. Ahead of the trial, the defendant offered a plea to a section 20 offence which was refused by the Crown. The Crown alleged that the defendant was enraged and committed a series of violent attacks in a residential property and fled with money and a mobile phone. The defence case was that it was the defendant himself who had been under attack. The defendant accepted causing injuries amounting to grievous bodily harm but stated that these were committed recklessly. The case gained significant media attention. At the end of the trial, a section 20 offence was left to the jury on a reckless basis as an alternative to the section 18 offence.
The defendant was acquitted of section 18, robbery, and both ABHs, and convicted only of the section 20 offence. All parties agreed that, if convicted, the starting point for the robbery offence alone was 13 years’ custody. The defendant ultimately received a suspended sentence.
Laura Paisley was instructed by Rachel Lancaster of Tremletts Solicitors.
Tom Edwards looks at the impact of the shift from Joint Enterprise to Common Purpose in the five years since…
Ben Hargreaves explores the inherent challenges in the admissibility of sexual history in sex cases. Section 41 of the Youth…
Silas Lee, pupil barrister, reviews the statutory regime on witness anonymity. Anonymous witness orders are most commonly sought by the…
An analysis of the law on fitness to plead and stand trial in the magistrates’ courts: Silas Lee reviews the…