News & Insights
Fatima Jama secures unanimous not guilty verdicts for two counts of threats with an offensive weapon in a public place in under half an hour following a 4-day trial at Portsmouth Crown Court.
The defence exposed fundamental flaws in the prosecution’s case through thorough cross examination of the five prosecution witnesses highlighting the many inconsistencies. The Judge delivered scathing criticism of the Crown’s charging decision, questioning why the defendant’s serious allegations against the complainants, including burglary of her property, were never investigated. As evidence emerged during trial, it became clear the defendant’s claims had merit.
The Judge openly enquired whether prejudice influenced the decision to charge the defendant, while ignoring equally serious allegations against the complainants in this neighbour dispute. The jury saw through the imbalance, deliberating for less than half an hour before delivering unanimous not guilty verdicts on all counts.
Fatima was instructed by Toby Brothers Legal Solicitors.
Tom Edwards looks at the impact of the shift from Joint Enterprise to Common Purpose in the five years since…
Ben Hargreaves explores the inherent challenges in the admissibility of sexual history in sex cases. Section 41 of the Youth…
An analysis of the law on fitness to plead and stand trial in the magistrates’ courts: Silas Lee reviews the…