News & Insights
Edward Henry KC successfully represented two directors of Cheshire Forest Hunt Limited at Chester Magistrates’ Court, where animal welfare charges against both defendants were dismissed following a successful submission of no case to answer.
The District Judge found the prosecution evidence to be “weak, vague and inconsistent” and concluded that no tribunal, properly directed, could convict upon it. Both defendants were awarded their costs.
The charges, brought under section 9 of the Animal Welfare Act 2006, arose from events in February 2025 when hounds following a laid trail deviated from their route. Neither defendant was present when the events occurred.
Edward was instructed by Astrea Linskills and supported by Stephen Welford of Welford Law.
Read the full Cheshire Forest Hunt press release here.
Tom Edwards looks at the impact of the shift from Joint Enterprise to Common Purpose in the five years since…
Ben Hargreaves explores the inherent challenges in the admissibility of sexual history in sex cases. Section 41 of the Youth…
An analysis of the law on fitness to plead and stand trial in the magistrates’ courts: Silas Lee reviews the…