Mountford Chambers delivers a nationwide and international service to clients, who are assured quality advice, advocacy and representation at all levels.
News & Insights
The Crown Court backlog in England and Wales has been a significant issue for the criminal justice system for many years, with the number of outstanding cases increasing to unprecedented levels.
The backlog has led to delays in trials and justice being served, and it has placed a significant burden on the criminal justice system.
The Crown Court hears serious criminal cases such as murder, rape, and robbery. The backlog in this court means that cases are taking longer to be heard, and trials are being delayed. According to the Ministry of Justice, as of December 2020, the backlog in the Crown Court was approximately 56,000 cases. This figure has been steadily increasing since 2010, but the pandemic has exacerbated the situation.
The Covid-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the court system, with many hearings and trials being postponed or moved online. Social distancing measures have also led to reduced capacity in courtrooms, leading to longer waiting times for trials to be heard. The backlog has also been exacerbated by the increased use of digital evidence, which requires additional time and resources to process.
The impact of the backlog is felt most acutely by victims of crime and their families, who may have to wait months or even years for justice to be served. Defendants are also affected, as delays can result in lengthy periods of remand, which can have a detrimental impact on their mental health and well-being.
The Government has taken steps to address the backlog, including providing additional funding and recruiting more staff to support the court system. The temporary Nightingale Courts have also been set up to help ease the pressure on existing courts, but they have been criticized for being insufficient to tackle the scale of the problem.
The use of technology has also been proposed as a solution to the backlog. The use of virtual hearings and video conferencing could help to reduce waiting times and increase the efficiency of the court system. However, concerns have been raised about the potential impact on the quality of justice, particularly in cases where a defendant’s liberty is at stake.
Impact on defendants
Delays in the Crown Court can have significant impacts on defendants, including the following:
Impact on victims of crime
For victims, delays in the crown court can mean a prolonged period of uncertainty and anxiety. They may have to relive their experiences by giving evidence in court, and delays can make this experience even more difficult. Victims may feel like justice is being delayed or denied, and this can have a negative impact on their mental health and wellbeing.
Delays can also affect victims’ ability to move on with their lives. They may be unable to access support services or seek closure until the case is resolved. This can impact their ability to work, maintain relationships, and take care of their families.
Furthermore, delays in the crown court can also impact the criminal justice system as a whole. It can cause backlogs in the court system, which can lead to longer waiting times for trials and a higher risk of cases being dropped due to lack of resources or witnesses.
What is happening in Crown Courts around England and Wales to address the backlog?
Unfortunately, not much. The government has introduced the following measures, but have they reduced the significant backlog?
1. Additional courtrooms: Some Crown Courts have opened additional courtrooms to increase capacity for hearings and trials. Before covid there were 467 court rooms in use to deal with criminal cases. After covid, the Government has opened 31 additional court rooms. That is an increase of 4.7%. the impact of these court rooms is of little significance in bringing down the backlog.
2. Remote hearings: The use of video conferencing and other remote technology has been expanded to allow more hearings to take place without the need for everyone to be physically present in the courtroom. This has had a positive effect, reducing the backlog as it means barristers are able to conduct more straightforward hearings without having to travel between court centres. This is seen as a positive step, and some would argue ought to be expanded to include trials.
3. Recruitment of additional judges: The government has announced plans to recruit 1,600 additional court staff, including judges, to help clear the backlog. However, with record numbers of people leaving the Criminal Bar, it is not clear how these vacancies will be filled. It has become increasingly common in areas outside of London to adjourn cases and trials due to a lack of availability of judges. The lack of judges, prosecutors and defence counsel is unfortunately resulting in the number of cases in the criminal justice system increasing.
What needs to be done to reduce the backlog?
Swift justice can be achieved by streamlining the legal process, investing in Courts and reducing unnecessary delays by increasing recruitment and retention. Some suggestions on making justice more swift include:
Where is the justice?
The Crown Court backlog in England and Wales is a significant issue that requires urgent action. The delays in justice being served have a profound impact on victims, defendants, and the wider criminal justice system. While some measures have been taken to address the backlog, more needs to be done to ensure that justice is served swiftly and efficiently, and more money needs to be spent to achieve this.
Justice for defendants and victims can only be achieved if it is swift. Swift justice acts as a deterrent to crime, as potential offenders are aware that they will be punished quickly if caught. This can lead to a reduction in crime rates.
Additionally, victims feel that their cases have been heard and resolved quickly, providing them with a sense of closure, satisfaction and reassurance.
And most importantly swift justice is an essential element of the rule of law, ensuring that justice is served promptly and that individuals are held accountable for their actions without spending many months on bail or on remand.
It cannot be said the current state of the justice system is one that is delivering justice to society. It is hoped the next government will consider this when considering its priorities in government as it is clear, investment in the system is needed to put the England and Wales on par with other counties who do not seem to have a backlog of 56,000 cases.
Tom Edwards looks at the impact of the shift from Joint Enterprise to Common Purpose in the five years since…
Ben Hargreaves explores the inherent challenges in the admissibility of sexual history in sex cases. Section 41 of the Youth…
An analysis of the law on fitness to plead and stand trial in the magistrates’ courts: Silas Lee reviews the…
Silas Lee, pupil barrister, reviews the statutory regime on witness anonymity. Anonymous witness orders are most commonly sought by the…
Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)