News & Insights
Chloe Birch was instructed to represent a young vulnerable teenager in an appeal against conviction for a child who had been found to have a bladed article with them when stopped by the police. Chloe’s client suffered psychological trauma from both his exploitation and his dealings with the police.
Having reviewed the original trial case, Chloe collated correspondence between the child’s family and Sussex Police, Social Services records following his placement into voluntary Social Care, and expert psychological evidence. These were served within comprehensive written representations setting out clear evidence of a section 45 defence. Following the original conviction, however, the Crown remained determined to proceed with the appeal in the face of this evidence.
Following written argument by Chloe challenging the incorrect application of the law to the decision to prosecute, the Crown indicated that they would no longer oppose the appeal and the appeal against conviction was allowed in full. Further to an application made by the defence, an intermediary had been granted for the assistance of Chloe’s client throughout the appeal proceedings, but thankfully he was not required to give evidence.
Chloe was instructed by Pelin Mehmet of SVS Solicitors.
Tom Edwards looks at the impact of the shift from Joint Enterprise to Common Purpose in the five years since…
Ben Hargreaves explores the inherent challenges in the admissibility of sexual history in sex cases. Section 41 of the Youth…
Silas Lee, pupil barrister, reviews the statutory regime on witness anonymity. Anonymous witness orders are most commonly sought by the…
An analysis of the law on fitness to plead and stand trial in the magistrates’ courts: Silas Lee reviews the…