News & Insights
The case involves the National Crime Agency (NCA), which is looking to seize 15 million pounds in bank accounts that belong to the wife, son, and nephew of Javanshir Feyziyev.
The family told Westminster Magistrates’ Court that the money had been transferred “in the most transparent way imaginable” to allow Dr Feyziyev’s wife Parvana and their son Orkhan Javanshir to move to London under the government’s Tier 1 investor scheme.
Charles Bott KC told the court that “this process involved the fullest disclosure of the source of the funds” and that it was “absurd” to portray this as money laundering.
He added: “This money is not – in fact or law – the proceeds of crime. It is, in large part, money which Javanshir Feyziyev used to enable his wife and son to satisfy the requirements of this country for their continuing residence.
Mr Bott added that the NCA had failed to provide any clear picture of the “Azerbaijan laundromat” and suggested that its “curious and truly unsatisfactory case” had a fantasy air.
“We may be reminded of the Loch Ness Monster. Some people say they have seen the tip above the water. Perhaps these are people who rather wanted to see it in the first place.
They tell us that a terrible beast lies beneath the surface. But no one knows what the beast looks like – or if he is really there at all.”
The case continues.
You can read more on the case in the following article:
Ben Hargreaves explores the inherent challenges in the admissibility of sexual history in sex cases. Section 41 of the Youth…
Tom Edwards looks at the impact of the shift from Joint Enterprise to Common Purpose in the five years since…
An analysis of the law on fitness to plead and stand trial in the magistrates’ courts: Silas Lee reviews the…
Silas Lee, pupil barrister, reviews the statutory regime on witness anonymity. Anonymous witness orders are most commonly sought by the…