Mountford Chambers delivers a nationwide and international service to clients, who are assured quality advice, advocacy and representation at all levels.
News & Insights
This was a difficult and sensitive case involving a foreign national who was charged with perverting the course of justice. The defendant had been accused of destroying important forensic evidence and bio materials in respect of a very serious offence that was being investigated by the police. Additionally, he was also accused of making a statement to police to provide a false alibi for another person accused of committing a very serious offence. The defence team conducted their own independent and forensic scrutiny of the CCTV evidence and a detailed analysis of the social app chat history on the phones. The hearing was fully contested by the Crown and a specialist investigative unit. However, the defence application for dismissal was upheld and the entire case dismissed against the defendant. Unusually, the case was dismissed on the basis that once the defence submissions had been considered, the Crown’s case was not credible.
Alphege was instructed by Joan Mitchell of Clifton Solicitors and Hind Ibrahim of IM Solicitors.
Tom Edwards looks at the impact of the shift from Joint Enterprise to Common Purpose in the five years since…
Ben Hargreaves explores the inherent challenges in the admissibility of sexual history in sex cases. Section 41 of the Youth…
Silas Lee, pupil barrister, reviews the statutory regime on witness anonymity. Anonymous witness orders are most commonly sought by the…
An analysis of the law on fitness to plead and stand trial in the magistrates’ courts: Silas Lee reviews the…